"don't need reason, don't need rhyme" - AC/DC
Arizona April, 1979: Non-Latino concert goer #1 [Sec 4 Row M Seat 12]
HIGH VOLTAGE! Agnus! FUCK YES! Bon you are GOD! Huh? What the fuck? Did that brownback just call me a prick? You mother fucker. What the fuck! Again? Say it again. I fucking dare you, you low-life piece of actual shit. I will push this bitch down in between us. That will be the last thing you ever see. That's right you had better smile at me you beaner fuck. Don't even look at me like that again you fucking spic fuck! HIGH VOLTAGE! ROCK-n-ROLL! WHOOOOOOOOOO! YES! Dude that was fucking amazing! Bon is god! Yeeeaaaahhh! Hey, fucker, turn your bean burrito face around. I'm not kidding you fucking piece of shit! Turn your face around or I will flush you and your brown friend down the toilet! I will stab this bitch in the throat to get to you. Keep it up!
Arizona April, 2010: Jan Brewer Un-elected Governor of Arizona [Bed w/ husband John]
HIGH VOLTAGE FENCE! NO! YES, please! NO! NO! NO! NO! NO! NO! Ugh, umm, ugh, oh, oh... Babe, are you okay? YES! I mean, of course yes I'm fine, I'm fine. You were having a dream hun. No, I wasn't having a dream. I was at the state senate hearings for Immigration Reform bill 1070. They were voting on the bill I had asked them for... an electrified 40 foot tall fence to keep all the wetbacks out of Arizona, my beloved country. They kept yelling no. They Just kept saying it over and over again. Oh Johnny Angel, it wasn't a dream, it was a NIGHTMARE! IT WAS A FUCKING NIGHTMARE! ARRGH! Baby, Baby, Baby... Hun, hun, shhhhh, shhhh. It's okay. You didnt's have a dream. Hahahahahaha... That was a nightmare. HAHAHAHAHA... Listen hun, what the Senate approved a few days ago is a dream and you get to sign it into law today. Who needs a 40 foot tall electrified fence when you have every state official from probation officer, to every last city Mayor, to the head of the Arizona Republican Political Action Comittee energized and empowered by the Senate's new law to send every ugly, evil, alien in this state back to Mexico or Mars. You are gold my lady.
Oh my. You are so right Hun. I just get so emotion about things sometimes. Remember when I signed the law allowing anyone to carry a gun into a bar? People just hated me. The liberal media was all over my ass. Hello! 2ND amendment anyone? But they wouldn't hear me out. I even told them that guns would not be allowed in any given bar if that bar had a 'No Guns Allowed' Policy. I mean, how fair can you get!? If someone owns a business I think they are smart enough to know if they should allow guns in their bar or not. It's pretty simple. If you have alot of spics and niggers in the neighborhood you put up a big sign that says NO GUNS ALLOWED. If you live a mostly white neighborhood then obviously you don't put up a sign.
Oh and then I signed that small bill repealing what that former dyke Governor Napolitano put in place. Hun, I don't think Janet Napolitano is a lesbian. Uh, hello! Have you seen her haircut!? She is a big dyke. She could take me down Sumo-Style and you know how I feel about thos slant-eyed bastards. It gives me chills just thinking about the War again. Hun you were born in 1944. How could you possibly remember WWII. I'm not talking about WWII baby, I'm talking about Vietnam. Hun, we weren't fighting the Japanese, we were fighting the North Vietnamese. Johnny! STOP RIGHT THERE! What hun? Can you tell a Chinese from a Korean? Uh, hahahahahahahaha.... you got me! Hahahahahahaha. They all have those devious little fucking eyes. I hate every single one of em. If you ask me Roosevelt should have kept all those chink fucks in those internment camps. Hilter at least had that right.
Oh and back to that dyke, Napolitano. Remember our nigger president pulled her to head the Secretary of.... Oh! Oh! Oh! That's right! Seretary of Homeland Security. YES! THE SECRETARY OF HOMELAND DEFENSE! How could you forget that! It's THE MOST IMPORTANT job in the whole big federal Government! And that's how I got my job! Do I have to keep telling you I was never elected!? Hahahahaha, no hun, I remember. I remember very well actually cause we never have to do anything. It was the easiest job you ever got! Hahahaha.... he-he he-he So true SO true you big lug!
So anyway remember how I repealed that queer gay bill, remember? Hun, that gay homosexual thing. Oh yeah yeah, the one that took away the rights for same sex couples to be considered as dependents. It only affected the 750 faggots and cunts that worked for the state government. It saved us alot of money and plus they all probably already have AIDS and are going to die anyway. Why waste the money.
Arizona April 1979: Latino concert goer #2 [Sec 4 Row M Seat 16]
HIGH VOLTAGE! Bon! SWEET!! LOVE YOU AGNUS! FUCK YES! RICK!!!!
YES!!!! AC/DC!!!! YES!!!! RICK!!! OVER HERE! OVER HERE! I'M OVER HERE MI AMIGO!!! :D
RICK! OVER H rrrrggghmmm
Arizona April 2010 Jan Bower Governor Concert goer #3 [Sec 4 Row M Seat 14]
I signed that bill today baby! I did it! One day soon there will be no more spics at concerts causing problems. They'll all be back where they belong. Born here or not. This is our country. Our daughters will grow-up in a safer world because of my 'unwavering signature.'
Hate Legislation was put into LAW today.
AVOID ARIZONA AT ALL COSTS. Do not visit The Grand Canyon. Do visit Lake Havasu. ASU games? That is a no. Baseball Spring Training, no. Don't even drive through the state. Yes, I am telling you to drive through UTAH. All of Arizona's Latino Congressmen & women are telling everyone to avoid the state at all costs. When people compare things to Nazi Germany it kills me to the core. Nothing compares to Nazi Germany and what millions of people died for there and Nazi Germay's occupied territories. I am today, however, lifting my own personal ban on comparing things to Nazi Germany when it comes to our 47th state. Because today, the formerly Great State of Arizona applied for it's name change.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Well, here goes yet another try. Maybe if I make people MAD enough, they'll comment.
ReplyDeleteBut why reinvent the wheel:
Part 1:
"ON Friday, Gov. Jan Brewer of Arizona signed a law — SB 1070 — that prohibits the harboring of illegal aliens and makes it a state crime for an alien to commit certain federal immigration crimes. It also requires police officers who, in the course of a traffic stop or other law-enforcement action, come to a “reasonable suspicion” that a person is an illegal alien verify the person’s immigration status with the federal government.
Predictably, groups that favor relaxed enforcement of immigration laws, including the American Civil Liberties Union and the Mexican American Legal Defense and Education Fund, insist the law is unconstitutional. Less predictably, President Obama declared it “misguided” and said the Justice Department would take a look.
Presumably, the government lawyers who do so will actually read the law, something its critics don’t seem to have done. The arguments we’ve heard against it either misrepresent its text or are otherwise inaccurate. As someone who helped draft the statute, I will rebut the major criticisms individually:
It is unfair to demand that aliens carry their documents with them. It is true that the Arizona law makes it a misdemeanor for an alien to fail to carry certain documents. “Now, suddenly, if you don’t have your papers ... you’re going to be harassed,” the president said. “That’s not the right way to go.” But since 1940, it has been a federal crime for aliens to fail to keep such registration documents with them. The Arizona law simply adds a state penalty to what was already a federal crime. Moreover, as anyone who has traveled abroad knows, other nations have similar documentation requirements.
“Reasonable suspicion” is a meaningless term that will permit police misconduct. Over the past four decades, federal courts have issued hundreds of opinions defining those two words. The Arizona law didn’t invent the concept: Precedents list the factors that can contribute to reasonable suspicion; when several are combined, the “totality of circumstances” that results may create reasonable suspicion that a crime has been committed.
For example, the Arizona law is most likely to come into play after a traffic stop. A police officer pulls a minivan over for speeding. A dozen passengers are crammed in. None has identification. The highway is a known alien-smuggling corridor. The driver is acting evasively. Those factors combine to create reasonable suspicion that the occupants are not in the country legally.
Part II:
ReplyDeleteThe law will allow police to engage in racial profiling. Actually, Section 2 provides that a law enforcement official “may not solely consider race, color or national origin” in making any stops or determining immigration status. In addition, all normal Fourth Amendment protections against profiling will continue to apply. In fact, the Arizona law actually reduces the likelihood of race-based harassment by compelling police officers to contact the federal government as soon as is practicable when they suspect a person is an illegal alien, as opposed to letting them make arrests on their own assessment.
It is unfair to demand that people carry a driver’s license. Arizona’s law does not require anyone, alien or otherwise, to carry a driver’s license. Rather, it gives any alien with a license a free pass if his immigration status is in doubt. Because Arizona allows only lawful residents to obtain licenses, an officer must presume that someone who produces one is legally in the country.
State governments aren’t allowed to get involved in immigration, which is a federal matter. While it is true that Washington holds primary authority in immigration, the Supreme Court since 1976 has recognized that states may enact laws to discourage illegal immigration without being pre-empted by federal law. As long as Congress hasn’t expressly forbidden the state law in question, the statute doesn’t conflict with federal law and Congress has not displaced all state laws from the field, it is permitted. That’s why Arizona’s 2007 law making it illegal to knowingly employ unauthorized aliens was sustained by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
In sum, the Arizona law hardly creates a police state. It takes a measured, reasonable step to give Arizona police officers another tool when they come into contact with illegal aliens during their normal law enforcement duties.
And it’s very necessary: Arizona is the ground zero of illegal immigration. Phoenix is the hub of human smuggling and the kidnapping capital of America, with more than 240 incidents reported in 2008. It’s no surprise that Arizona’s police associations favored the bill, along with 70 percent of Arizonans.
President Obama and the Beltway crowd feel these problems can be taken care of with “comprehensive immigration reform” — meaning amnesty and a few other new laws. But we already have plenty of federal immigration laws on the books, and the typical illegal alien is guilty of breaking many of them. What we need is for the executive branch to enforce the laws that we already have.
And finally - Part III
ReplyDeleteUnfortunately, the Obama administration has scaled back work-site enforcement and otherwise shown it does not consider immigration laws to be a high priority. Is it any wonder the Arizona Legislature, at the front line of the immigration issue, sees things differently?"
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/29/opinion/29kobach.html
It is passing strange for federal officials, including the president, to accuse Arizona of irresponsibility while the federal government is refusing to fulfill its responsibility to control the nation's borders. Such control is an essential attribute of national sovereignty. America is the only developed nation that has a 2,000-mile border with a developing nation, and the government's refusal to control that border is why there are an estimated 460,000 illegal immigrants in Arizona and why the nation, sensibly insisting on first things first, resists “comprehensive” immigration reform.
Arizona's law makes what is already a federal offense — being in the country illegally — a state offense. Some critics seem not to understand Arizona's right to assert concurrent jurisdiction. The Mexican American Legal Defense and Education Fund attacks Gov. Jan Brewer's character and motives, saying she “caved to the radical fringe.” This poses a semantic puzzle: Can the large majority of Arizonans who support the law be a “fringe” of their state?
Popularity makes no law invulnerable to invalidation. Americans accept judicial supervision of their democracy — judicial review of popular but possibly unconstitutional statutes — because they know that if the Constitution is truly to constitute the nation, it must trump some majority preferences. The Constitution, the Supreme Court has said, puts certain things “beyond the reach of majorities.”
http://www.courier-journal.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=20104280366
Duh! Just what part of "illegal immigrant" don't you understand?
OK, if this doesn't provoke all you tree-huggin', Latino-lovin," Commie pinko socialists to jump all over me, well, heck - I give up.